PROGRAM AREA OVERVIEW --
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 http://www.em.doe.gov  

With the end of the Cold War, the Department of Energy (DOE) is focusing on understanding and eliminating the enormous environmental problems created by the Department's historical mission of nuclear weapons production.  The DOE's Office of Environmental Management (EM) seeks to eliminate these threats to human health and the environment, as well as to prevent pollution from on-going activities.  The goals for waste management and environmental remediation include meeting regulatory compliance agreements, reducing the cost and risk associated with waste treatment and disposal, and expediently deploying technologies to accomplish these activities.  While radioactive contaminants are the prime concern, hazardous metals and organics, as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), are also important.

The responsibilities of DOE's Office of EM include the remediation of radioactive and toxic wastes to their original background levels and the deactivation and decommissioning (D&D) of thousands of contaminated facilities.  With regard to site remediation, DOE needs to locate and remediate contaminated plumes to prevent groundwater contamination and potential off-site migration of the plume.  New or improved technologies are sought to address issues related to materials for reactive barriers and for in situ monitoring systems to facilitate the use of reactive barriers.  DOE also needs to reduce the volume of contaminated concrete and associated waste streams, therefore, new or improved technologies are needed to separate contaminates from concrete.  Lastly, DOE needs to reduce risks to workers from potential exposures associated with decontamination and decommissioning activities; therefore, new or improved technologies are sought for remote cutting or sizing technologies and for multi-purpose remote platforms.

DOE’s inventory of transuranic and mixed wastes include about 155,000 cubic meters of waste stored on some 30 DOE sites and another 450,000 cubic meters of buried waste – at least some of which is likely to require retrieval in the course of DOE’s site cleanup program.  Most of the stored inventory is contained in 55-gallon drums or other containers.  Although some of the buried waste is similarly packaged, knowledge of the condition of these containers and their contents is limited.  In addition, some of the waste was buried in containers with limited or no durability container (e.g., in plastic bags or cardboard boxes) or was buried without containment.

The following topic solicits grant applications for technologies to facilitate the management of buried transuranic and mixed waste.  The subtopics provide more detailed descriptions of specific needs.

 

26. TECHNOLOGIES TO FACILITATE MANAGEMENT OF BURIED TRANSURANIC AND MIXED WASTE

Land disposal of untreated, chemically contaminated wastes was prohibited in the mid-1970s when the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) was enacted.  However, prior to 1970, the Department of Energy disposed of substantial quantities of transuranic (TRU) waste in near-surface excavations (shallow land disposal).  Some of these wastes were buried in containers that may be retrievable; some were buried in bulk.  In addition, a quantity of pond and lagoon sludges and associated soil remains buried.

There are several options for dealing with this waste, depending on the degree to which it endangers the environment.  Some of the waste buried at individual DOE sites may be left in place and monitored during long-term site stewardship programs.  Other buried waste may be retrieved for treatment and disposition as TRU or mixed waste.  Before decisions can be made, research is needed to address the challenges involved in locating and characterizing these materials.  This topic address three problem areas related to the management of buried TRU and mixed wastes.  Grant applications are sought only in the following subtopics:

a.  Improved, Noninvasive Assessment Methods to Locate and Identify Buried Waste and Determine Whether or Not it is Containerized – The retrieval of buried waste and contaminated media generally involves excavating the entire area where the material is known or expected to be, a very time-consuming and expensive process. Before the waste can be retrieved it must be located and a preliminary characterization (at least) must be made of its condition. Research is needed on methods to improve object identification.  Therefore, grant applications are sought to develop new technologies for locating and identifying specific objects (e.g., drums, gloveboxes) that are below ground and determining if they need to be retrieved.  Areas of research interest include the improvement of object identification and image resolution (to determine if the contaminated objects are drums, boxes, rocks, etc), improvements in image analysis, and the development identification models and software.

b.   Imaging Technology for Assessing the Condition of Buried Waste –After the buried waste is located, and prior to retrieval, it will be necessary to determine the condition of the waste or waste container.  If the drums or other containers are intact, they can be retrieved and handled using processes developed for stored waste.  The retrieval of breached containers or non-containerized waste would be more difficult.  To minimize the number of processing steps and to ensure worker safety, a more detailed characterization of the waste containers and their content must be performed at the retrieval site.  Grant applications are sought to develop imaging technology to identify and characterize objects below ground.  Of particular interest is the characterization of buried waste containers and the determination of potential leakage.  Approaches could be nonintrusive (preferred) or intrusive and could be coupled with chemical analysis.  Nonintrusive approaches may include ground penetrating radar, magnetometry, acoustics, chemical sensing of near-surface air samples, neutron activation, radiological surveys, etc.  An example of a minimally intrusive approach would be the utilization of small-diameter bore-holes to emplace equipment or sensors or collect samples.

Grant applications are also sought to develop methods to improve image resolution and object identification.  Sophisticated image analysis and identification models and software should determine what waste is buried, the condition of the buried waste, the potential contamination of the soil surrounding the buried waste, and whether or not the buried waste is containerized or stabilized.

c.  Long-Life, Reliable Sensors that can be Remotely Interrogated for Improved Monitoring of Buried Waste Disposal Sites – Smart sensors can improve the monitoring of buried waste sites.  Grant applications are sought to develop smart sensors for monitoring buried waste sites in order to determine changes in the conditions (physical, chemical, radiological, or biological) of either the buried waste or the soil surrounding the buried waste.  State-of-the-art improvements could make it possible to interrogate sensors from remote locations and provide remote, standoff detection of both chemical and radiological hazards.  The sensors should be able to detect the physical changes in either the containers or the soil surrounding the buried wastes; or chemical, radiological, or biological changes in the surrounding area, which could indicate that the buried waste is migrating through the surrounding environment.

References:

1.      Cleanup Tools:  Behind the Scenes at a Superfund Site, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
http://www.epa.gov/oerrpage/superfund/accomp/400/tools.htm)  

2.      National Research Council, Characterization of Remote-Handled Transuranic Wastes for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Final Report, Washington, DC:  National Academy Press, 2002.  (Available at:  http://www.nap.edu/books/0309084601/html/62.html)  

3.      National Research Council, Research Opportunities for Managing the Department of Energy’s Transuranic and Mixed Wastes, Final Report, Washington, DC:  National Academy Press, 2002.  (Available at:  http://search.nap.edu/nap-cgi/naptitle.cgi?Search=Research+Opportunities+for+Transuranic+and+Mixed+Wastes)  

4.      EM:  U.S. DOE Office of Environmental Management, http://www.em.doe.gov  

5.      EM Office of Science and Technology, U.S. DOE Office of Environmental Management's Office of Science and Technology, http://apps.em.doe.gov/ost  

6.      Performance Management Plan for the Accelerated Cleanup of the Hanford Site, U.S. DOE Richland Operations Office and Office of River Protection, http://www.hanford.gov/docs/hpmp  

7.      Accelerating Cleanup of the INEEL, U.S. DOE Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, http://www.inel.gov/environment/