PROGRAM AREA OVERVIEW--
DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION

 http://www.nnsa.doe.gov/na-20

The Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation, a component of the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), sponsors the development of many types of sensors, data collection systems, and data analysis systems to detect and deter the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.  The scope of this mission includes technologies for nuclear explosion monitoring, detection of the production of materials for nuclear weapons, and detection technologies to support the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty (NPT). 

 

17. TECHNOLOGY TO SUPPORT THE NUCLEAR AND RADIOLOGICAL NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAM

The DOE/NNSA Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation sponsors the development of many types of sensors, data collection systems, and data analysis systems to detect and deter the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.  The scope of this mission includes developing technologies to detect the production of materials for nuclear weapons, and to support the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty (NPT).  The Nuclear and Radiological National Security Program (NRNSP) develops technologies for detecting the radiation and chemical signatures associated with the production of nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons materials.  This topic focuses on the development of detection systems and data analysis methods to address these NRNSP missions.  Grant applications are sought only in the following subtopics:

 a.  Radiation Detection Technologies – Improved technologies must be developed and demonstrated to support onsite monitoring and verification of the NPT and other international arms control agreements.  In particular, research is needed to demonstrate practical methods for detecting the diversion of small quantities of nuclear materials from known production sites of highly enriched uranium.  Grant applications are sought to develop:  (1) new scintillator materials, other suitable materials, and enabling technologies to substantially increase the performance (in resolution, sensitivity, and range) of currently available radiation detectors; (2) new safeguard practices for the improved detection, identification, and tracking of diverted fissile materials in transit, particularly when the materials are shielded; and (3) unattended sensor systems that integrate signature analysis and alarm functions into an expandable network based on state-of-the-art communication and internet protocol systems.

b.  Detection and Monitoring of Nuclear Facilities – Detection networks and systems are needed to support the wide-area monitoring, detection, location, and characterization of non-declared nuclear activities.  Grant applications are sought to develop an improved capability for the long-term monitoring of chemical and other signatures of nuclear materials production, e.g., effluents from uranium conversion and enrichment facilities, spent nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities, etc.  Areas of interest include:  (1) improved sample preparation, concentration, and ultra-sensitive (field or laboratory-based) analysis methods; (2) remote systems to exploit non-nuclear signatures such as optical, effluent, and process-specific signatures; (3) application of nanotechnologies to the detection of radiation and chemical signatures of nuclear proliferation; and (4) advanced, maintenance-free power sources that can independently power sensor equipment on site.

References:

Subtopic a:  Radiation Detection Technologies

1.      The IAEA Safeguards System: Ready for the 21st Century, International Atomic Energy Agency,
http://www.iaea.org/worldatom/Press/Booklets/Safeguards2/part5.html  

2.      U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Nuclear Safeguards and the International Atomic Energy Agency, OTA-ISS-615, Washington, DC:  U.S. Government Printing Office, June 1995.  (Full text available at: http://www.wws.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/byteserv.prl/~ota/disk1/1995/9530/9530.PDF)  

Subtopic b:  Detection and Monitoring of Nuclear Facilities  

3.      U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Technologies Underlying Weapons of Mass Destruction, OTA-BP-ISC-115, Washington, DC:  U.S. Government Printing Office, December 1993.  (Full text available at:  http://www.wws.princeton.edu/~ota/disk1/1993/9344.html)  

4.      U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Environmental Monitoring for Nuclear Safeguards, OTA-BP-ISS-168, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1995.  (Full text available at:  http://www.wws.princeton.edu/~ota/disk1/1995/9518/9518.PDF)  

 

18. TECHNOLOGY TO DETECT NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION AND SUPPORT NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION AGREEMENTS  

The DOE/NNSA Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation sponsors the development of many types of sensors, data collection systems and data analysis systems to detect the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.  Within the office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation, the Proliferation Detection program develops and demonstrates innovative remote sensing and ground-based technologies for detection and analysis of foreign nuclear weapon programs, global nuclear materials production, the diversion of special nuclear materials, and the early stages of emerging proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.  This topic focuses on the development of detection systems and data analysis methods to address these missions.  Grant applications are sought only in the following subtopics:  

a. Components for Synthetic Aperture Radar Systems – Grant applications are sought for one or more of the following electronic components to support the development of synthetic aperture radar systems:  

(1) An advanced high-performance 10-bit Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) to facilitate new high performance radar designs. ADC systems must have a sampling frequency equal to or greater than 1.2 GigaSamples per second, greater than 9 effective number of bits (ENOB) at one fourth the sampling frequency (fs/4), a built-in 1:2 output demultiplexer, provisions for multiple ADC data clock synchronization (e.g., multi-channel sampling), low-voltage differential signaling (LVDS) compatible logic outputs, a ball grid array (BGA) package, and a built-in pseudo-random sequence generator for ADC interface integrity testing.  

(2) An advanced high-performance 12-bit Digital-to-Analog Converter (DAC) with 1.2 GigaSamples/second, greater than 60 decibels (dB) spurious free dynamic range (SFDR) at one fourth the sampling frequency (fs/4), a built-in 2:1 input multiplexer, provisions for multiple DAC clock synchronization (e.g., quadrature synthesis), low-voltage differential signaling (LVDS) compatible logic inputs, a ball grid array (BGA) package, and an input FIFO (First-In, First-out) buffer with a low-data-rate serial output port for DAC interface integrity testing.  Also, it would be very desirable to have two DACs on a single chip.  

(3) Ultra-fast track-and-hold amplifiers capable of directly sampling 10 GHz signals.  The intent is to employ the track-and-hold amplifier in a sub-Nyquist sampling architecture for a radar receiver.  Requirements include 0.2 psec aperture stability, 1.5 GHz aperture rate, 0.5 Vpp maximum output signal amplitude, -45 dBc maximum peak harmonic and spurious distortion at maximum signal amplitude, 0.25 dB maximum gain flatness, 0 to +40 C operating temperature, and surface mount packaging.  

(4) High-performance miniaturized gyros with a bias of one degree per hour or less.  Airborne, high-performance real-time synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems use inertial measurement units (IMUs) that contain three gyros and three accelerometers, and the size of the IMU is typically dominated by the gyros.  Tactical-grade IMUs with gyro biases of 1 degrees/hour have been used successfully for fine-resolution SAR but are too large for proposed miniaturized SAR systems.  Therefore, a small, lightweight gyro is needed for these systems.  Tactical performance levels are desired, but grant applications proposing gyros with biases of 10-100 degrees/hour would be considered if tactical performance levels cannot be obtained.  (However, the latter may be less likely to be selected.)  

(5) A solid-state wideband microwave power amplifier module to replace tube-based transmitters for short-range applications.   Ideally, the module would have at least 100 Watts of peak power at a 35% duty factor and a 3 GigaHertz instantaneous bandwidth centered at Ku-band (16.7 GigaHertz).   Grant applications proposing somewhat lower performance would be considered, but with lower probability of selection.  The module should be 15 cubic inches or less and should include microthermal technology (such as micro-heat-pipes) to control junction temperatures without sacrificing size.  

(6) Wideband array antennas with a minimum of 3 GigaHertz bandwidth centered at the Ku-band (16.7 GigaHertz).  Dual band operation over both X-band and Ku-band is desirable.  

(7) Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) implementation of SAR image formation algorithms.  The promise of the newest FPGA technology (such as the Xylinx Virtex 2 family) is that many sophisticated software algorithms could be programmed directly into FPGA firmware for an increase in processing compactness and speed.  In particular, it is desirable to have the well-known SAR image formation algorithm, Polar Format processing, be programmed into FPGA components.  This implementation must retain parametric flexibility and allow an image formation greater than 1000 by 1000 pixels at programmable resolutions.  

(8) Light-weight mechanical pointing structures for antenna stabilization and pointing for radar systems based on unmanned airborne vehicles (UAV).  The range of motion should include at least 270 degrees in azimuth, and 0 to 90 degrees from horizontal in elevation.  In the third axis, plus and minus 20 degrees of roll is desired.  Slew rates of at least 60 degrees/sec are required with less than 0.1 second settling time, and pointing accuracy should be within 0.1 degrees.  Inertial stabilization is desired to minimize power requirements.  Total gimbal weight must be less than 10 pounds, and the system should be able to support up to a 10 pound payload.  

For further information or clarification of these requirements please contact Armin Doerry ((505) 845-8165, awdoerr@sandia.gov) at the Sandia National Laboratory.  

b.  Components to Improve Active Imaging Systems – Grant applications are sought for high-throughput optical filters (with throughputs of 5 cm2-steradians or higher for apertures of no more than 5-10 cm) operating in the visible and/or near-infrared (400 nm - 3.0 µm) regions of the electromagnetic spectrum.  Filters of interest must have a single bandpass of no more than 0.1 nanometers or multiple (three or more) widely separated bandpasses of 1 nanometer or less.  Filter tunability would be useful, but is not a requirement.

Grant applications are also sought for photocathodes for advanced sensors for single photon detection and imaging in the 1.5-3 µm spectral region.  Transmissive devices are contemplated, but novel devices with other geometries could be considered.  Important characteristics include room temperature operation, high quantum efficiency (>10% at 1.5 µm, the wavelength of most interest), low noise (<1 nA/cm2 at 25C operating temperature), and fast (< 1 ns) response.  Uniformity, linearity, and such processing factors as resistance to contamination are also important.  Customizable spectral responsivity would also be of interest.  

Grant applications are also sought for the development of a compact, portable seed laser with short (less than 1 nanosecond) pulses, a narrow (less than 1 nanometer) spectral bandwidth, and an intermediate pulse repetition rate that is adjustable between 1 KiloHertz and 1 MegaHertz or wider.  Pulse energy should be 10 nanoJoules or higher. Because further amplification and wavelength conversion is likely, a wavelength in the 1.0 to 1.5 micrometer range is desired.  Lightweight, low power consumption, and small size (0.5 cubic feet or less for the laser, and a similar size for the associated power supplies/electronics), and high pulse contrast ratio are also very important.  Technologies offering a pathway to shorter pulses, higher pulse energy, and/or more flexible pulse formats are strongly preferred.  

Finally, grant applications are sought for compact power amplifiers for use with the laser oscillators described above. Output pulse energies must be 10 microJoules or higher. These amplifier systems must be of small size (0.5 cubic feet or less for the laser, and a similar size for the associated power supplies/electronics).

For further information or clarification of these requirements please contact Cheng Ho (505-667-3904, ho@lanl.gov) or David C. Thompson (505-667-5168, dcthomp@lanl.gov) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory.  

References:

 

Subtopic a:  Components for Synthetic Aperture Radar Systems  

1.      2001 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, Phoenix, AZ, May 20-25, 2001, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2001.  (ISBN: 0-7803-6538-0) (IEEE Catalogue No. 01CH37157)  

2.      Kim, T. J., et al., “An Integrated Navigation System Using GPS Carrier Phase for Real-Time Airborne/Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR),” Navigation, 48(1):13-24, Spring 2001.  (ISSN:  0028-8152)  

3.      Synthetic Aperture Radar, Sandia National Laboratories, http://www.sandia.gov/radar/sar.html  

Subtopic b: Components to Improve Active Imaging Systems

 

4.      Baron, M. H., and Priedhorsky, W. C., “Crossed Delay Line Detector for Ground- and Space-Based Applications,” EUV, X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy IV:  Proceedings of the SPIE (International Society for Optical Engineering), 2006:188-197, November 1993.  (Available from SPIE at:  http://spie.org/app/Publications/.  Select Advanced Search and search papers by title words, authors and publication date.)  

5.      Ho, C., et al., “Demonstration of Literal Three-Dimensional Imaging,” Applied Optics, 38:1833-1840, 1999.  (ISSN: 0003-6935)  

6.      Priedhorsky, W. C., et al., “Laser Ranging and Mapping with a Photon-Counting Detector,” Applied Optics, 35:441-452, 1996.  (ISSN: 0003-6935)  

7.      Single Photon Detector and 3-D Imaging, Los Alamos National Laboratory, http://www.rulli.lanl.gov/  

 

19. RESEARCH TO SUPPORT GLOBAL NUCLEAR EXPLOSION MONITORING  

The Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Research & Engineering (NEM R&E) program is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Office of Nonproliferation Research and Engineering.  This program is responsible for the research and development necessary to provide the U.S. Government with capabilities for monitoring nuclear explosions.  The NEM R&E program provides research products to the Air Force Technical Applications Center (AFTAC), which collects and analyses data from a network of seismic, radionuclide, hydroacoustic, and infrasound data collection stations.  Within the context of one or more of these technologies, research is sought to develop algorithms, hardware, and software for improved event detection, location, and identification at thresholds and confidence levels that meet U.S. requirements in a cost-effective manner.  Grant applications responding to this topic must demonstrate how the proposed approaches would complement and be coordinated with ongoing or completed work (see list of ongoing contracts https://www.nemre.nnsa.doe.gov/coordination) while improving capability.

Grant applications are sought only in the area of technologies for nuclear explosion monitoring, as described below.  

a. Ground-Based Systems for Seismic Monitoring of Nuclear Explosions – Grant applications are sought for systems that will greatly improve the data availability for existing seismic stations while reducing operation and maintenance costs.  Sensor data must be collected continuously with very low noise and transmitted to a data center in near real time with high reliability (>99%).  Designs should include robustness, low-power, and reliable wireless communication from each sensor site to the central location over rough terrain.  Grant applications to develop schemes for direct communication between the sensor site and the data center via satellite; the goal is to reduce satellite communication costs and the size and power demand of field components.  

b.  Ground-Based Systems for Radionuclide Effluent Monitoring of Nuclear Explosions – Grant applications are sought to improve radionuclide effluent monitoring systems through diagnostic/predictive statistical tools, including state-of-health data transmitted from existing ground-based systems.  These tools should include mathematical algorithms to exploit signatures in the state-of-health data to detect, diagnose, and predict subtle hardware faults, thereby improving availability, lowering cost, and increasing the confidence in network operations.  The software tools must be of proven reliability and take into consideration the wide extremes in the environmental conditions of the ground-based sampler/analyzers.  

Grant applications are also sought to explore the use of beta-gamma coincidence to detect radioactive xenon isotopes, which could improve data availability, cost of operations, and, potentially, sensitivity.  Existing systems utilize a plastic scintillator for beta detection and NaI for gamma detection in a system with 12 photo-multiplier tubes for 4 sample chambers.  A system that is much easier to calibrate, i.e. having fewer photo-multiplier tubes per sample chamber, would be desirable.  The replacement system should use one phototube per sample chamber and digital signal processing to extract beta and gamma signals from a “Phoswich”-configured, dual-scintillator detector.  The system must withstand thermal and mechanical shock and allow the introduction and subsequent evacuation of ~10cc of gas sample with at most 0.5% memory effect between samples.  

References:  

1.      Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Research and Engineering Program Strategic Plan, National Nuclear Security Administration, September 2003.  (Document No. DOE/NNSA/NA-22-NEMRE-2003) (Full text available at:  https://www.nemre.nnsa.doe.gov/coordination)  

2.      U.S. National Data Center, Air Force Technical Applications Center, http://www.tt.aftac.gov/toppage.html  

3.      Proceedings of the 25th Seismic Research Review-Nuclear Explosion Monitoring:  Building the Knowledge Base, Tucson, AZ, September 23-25, 2003, sponsored by National Nuclear Security Administration/Air Force Research Laboratory; Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2003.  (Report No. LA-UR-03-6029) (Available at:  https://www.nemre.nnsa.doe.gov/coordination.  On top menu, select “Previous SRR Proceedings,” and then “2003.”)  

4.      Proceedings of the 24th Seismic Research Review—Nuclear Explosion Monitoring:  Innovation and Integration, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, September 17-19, 2002, sponsored by National Nuclear Security Administration/Defense Threat Reduction Agency; Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2002.  (Report No. LA-UR-02-5048) (Available at:  https://www.nemre.nnsa.doe.gov/coordination.  On top menu, select “Previous SRR Proceedings,” and then “2002.”)  

5.      Proceedings of the 23rd Seismic Research Review:  Worldwide Monitoring of Nuclear Explosions, Jackson Hole, WY, October 2-5, 2001, sponsored by National Nuclear Security Administration/Defense Threat Reduction Agency; Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2001.  (Report No. LA-UR-01-4454) (Available at:  https://www.nemre.nnsa.doe.gov/coordination.  On top menu, select “Previous SRR Proceedings,” and then “2001.”)