21. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATIONS FOR FOSSIL ENERGY APPLICATIONS

The use of coal in energy utilization and conversion systems suffers from a number of considerations with respect to the fuel itself.  Coal is a solid fuel containing components that are precursors of environmental pollutants or materials that are potentially damaging to downstream components.  Further, coal contains mineral matter that is converted into ash, which can lead to suspended particulates in air, erosion of or deposition in downstream components, and problems of solid waste disposal.  This topic seeks to mitigate the environmental disadvantages of coal utilization, including its potential impact on water quality and availability, through improvements in various aspects of the coal utilization cycle.  The research is expected to provide high-quality scientific information on present and emerging environmental issues for use in regulatory and policy decision-making.  Environmental considerations and the concomitant need for low-cost compliance options are the primary drivers of the current research program.  Also the development of robust sensor networks for coal power systems, using instrumentation that can withstand the harsh conditions of advanced power generation systems. Grant applications to address these needs are solicited only in the following subtopics:

a. Development of Technologies to Reduce Freshwater Use and Consumption in Coal-Fired Power Plants—Electricity production requires a reliable, abundant, and predictable source of freshwater – a resource that is limited in many parts of the United States.  The process of thermoelectric generation from fossil fuels is water intensive – an average of 25 gallons of water is needed to produce a kWh of electricity, primarily for steam cooling purposes.   In addition, power plants also use water for operation of pollution control devices such as flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technology as well as for ash handling, wastewater treatment, and wash water.  Requiring more than 136 billion gallons of freshwater a day (USGS Circular 1268, 2004), the existing fleet of fossil fuel fired power plants is second only to agriculture (irrigation and livestock) in terms of fresh water use in the United States.

In addition to the significant amount of freshwater needed for the generation of electricity, power plants may also impact water quality. Both the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) regulate the discharge of pollutants from power plants to receiving waters as well as the intake of water for cooling and other power plant needs.  For instance, the CWA contains Sections 316(a) and 316(b) which cover water thermal discharge and cooling water intake structures. 

Grant applications are sought for reducing the amount of freshwater required for coal power plant operations and minimizing the potential impacts of plant operations on water quality.  Therefore, grant applications are sought in the following areas of interest:  1) reduction in the quantity of freshwater required for coal-fired power generation, 2) water quality improvements in coal power generation, 3) reduction in the capital and operating costs associated with power plant cooling towers and development of hybrid wet-dry systems that optimize the advantages of wet and dry cooling towers, and 4) development of novel, low-cost treatment technology to allow the use of non-traditional waters (i.e. mine pool water, coal-bed methane produced water, municipal wastewater) as process water for coal power plants.

Questions - contact Sara Pletcher (sara.pletcher@netl.doe.gov) 

b. Novel Technologies for Sequestering Mercury in Flue Gas Desulfurization Solids Under Disposal or Beneficial Use Environments—More than half of the electricity generated in the U.S. is produced by coal-fired facilities.  In January of 2004, EPA published another draft regulation that targets both sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from power plants.  To comply with this regulation, it is anticipated that more units will be equipped with flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technologies.  In fact, FGD production in the U.S. may increase by an order of magnitude to almost 200 million tons, thus exceeding the production of all other coal combustion products.  The partitioning of mercury in flue gas desulfurization (FGD) sludge is not completely defined, with Hg oftentimes concentrating in fines, rather than crystalline, portion of the solid gypsum.  However, Hg has also been found in the scrubber liquor and in the larger crystalline structure.  More effective strategies are needed to concentrate and sequester Hg in FGD solids so that it is not released to the environment either during disposal or through re-use.

Grant applications are sought to develop novel technologies and or products that concentrate and sequester mercury in FGD solids under disposal or beneficial use environments, particularly related to the use of flue gas desulfurization materials (synthetic gypsum) in wallboard production.

Questions – contact Robert Patton (patton@netl.doe.gov)

c. Novel Approaches for Monitoring the Condition of Advanced Power Plants—Novel approaches are sought for the development and design of on-line instrumentation and sensors capable of monitoring the state of critical equipment and components within an advanced power plant.  Instrumentation and sensors capable of monitoring in high temperature harsh environments for the measurement of stress/strain, corrosion, thermal barrier coating wear, fouling, and/or material fatigue/cracking are of interest.  New approaches to embedded sensor designs or non-destructive evaluation (NDE) techniques are of interest along with wireless data communication capabilities.  Development and utilization of other types of measurements are also of interest for the creation of a network of condition monitoring sensors.  Sensor networks will likely include the use of harsh environment physical and chemical/gas sensors as well as those that operate at more benign conditions to provide real time diagnostic capabilities. Employing robust sensing networks will enable the development or use of algorithms and models for the prediction of equipment/component maintenance, remaining life and failure.  Predictive algorithms and models should be considered an integral part of a robust condition monitoring system.

Grant applications are sought for condition monitoring sensor networks and software will improve system control, protect capital equipment investment, and promote safety through prevention of catastrophic equipment failure.  Equipment that could potentially benefit from the development of advanced condition monitoring approaches include coal gasifiers, turbines, advanced coal combustion systems, selective catalytic reduction systems and other critical or high maintenance equipment commonly employed in energy and power generation systems.

Questions – contact Susan Maley (susan.maley@netl.doe.gov)

References:

Subtopic a:  Development of Technologies to Reduce Freshwater Use and Consumption in Coal-Fired Power Plants

1.      “Water - Energy Interface,” U.S. DOE National Energy Technology Laboratory, http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/ewr/water/ (To see how this program fits into NETL; start at the NETL home page, http://www.netl.doe.gov/.  On the left menu select “Technologies”.  Under “Technologies,” select “Coal & Power Systems” then “Environmental & Water.  In the center of the page select the third bullet, “Water-Energy Interface”.  These instructions should bring the viewer to the same Web location, and give a broader perspective of this subtopic.)

2.      “Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2000,” United States Geological Service (USGS), May 2004.  (USGS Circular 1268) ( Full text available at:  http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2004/circ1268/)

3.      “Clean Water Act Snapshot,” United States Environmental Protection Agency Website. (URL:  http://www.epa.gov/region5/water/cwa.htm) 

4.      “Safe Drinking Water Act – Regulations and Guidance,” United States Environmental Protection Agency Website.  (URL:  http://www.epa.gov/safewater/regs.html)

Subtopic b:  Novel Technologies for Sequestering Mercury in Flue Gas Desulfurization Solids Under Disposal or Beneficial Use Environments

5.      Pflughoeft-Hassett, D.F., et al., “Barriers to the Increased Utilization of Coal Combustion/Desulfurization By-Products by Government and Commercial Sectors – Update 1998,” Topical Report, Energy & Environment Research Center, University of North Dakota, July 1999.  (Available at:  http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/ewr/ref-shelf.html.  In the Table of Contents box, click on “Coal Utilization By-Products”, then click on the document title at the ninth bullet and wait.)

6.      Moretti, C. J., "An Evaluation of Disposal and Utilization Options for Advanced Coal Utilization Wastes,” American Power Conference, Chicago, IL, April 9-11, 1996 .  (Available in PDF at:  http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/cctc/cctdp/bibliography/misc/bibm_cwbu.html.  Scroll half way down page and click on title above.)

7.      Aljoe, W. W., et al., “The Fate of Mercury in Coal Utilization By-Products - DOE/NETL's Research Program,” presented at the China Workshop on Mercury Control from Coal Combustion, Beijing, China, Oct. 31 – Nov. 2, 2005.  (Full text available at: http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/ewr/coal_utilization_byproducts/).  Under “The Coal Utilization By-Products (CUB) program” see second title in blue box. )

Subtopic c:  Novel Approaches for Monitoring the Condition of Advanced Power Plants

8.      Descriptions of the advanced power systems can be found on the National Energy Technology Laboratory’s (NETL) Website:  http://www.netl.doe.gov/

 

Return to the Complete List of Topics

 

Program Information, Instructions and Requirements  |  Technical Topic Descriptions  |  Download Program Information  | Download Technical Topics |